Planning appeal decision
The Barn, Braxted Park Road, Tiptree Heath, CO5 0QB
Planning appeal 3304513 at The Barn, Braxted Park Road, Tiptree Heath, CO5 0QB (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 14 December 2023 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Blackwater Estuary Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, and the Dengie SPA and Ramsar site, which are designated European sites of nature conservation importance.
the erection of four 3-bedroom new build dwellings
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- CO5 0QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Blackwater Estuary Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, and the Dengie SPA and Ramsar site, which are designated European sites of nature conservation importance
- Whether the proposed dwellings would be in an appropriate location for new housing, with particular regard to the Council's settlement strategy and accessibility to local facilities and services
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- If there is any harm, whether this is outweighed by other considerations, particularly whether there is a fallback position for an alternative proposed development
What decided it
The adverse effects on the integrity of the designated European sites of nature conservation importance, which provide a clear reason for refusal under Footnote 7 to Paragraph 11.d)i. of the Framework and cannot be outweighed by the fallback position or other material considerations.
The modest benefits to character and appearance and the fallback Class Q scheme were outweighed by the very significant weight of the adverse effects on the integrity of the designated European sites, which provided a clear reason for refusal under the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S8Policy T1Policy T2Policy D1Policy H4Policy I1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266011264Rosary, Grange Road, Tillingham, CM0 7UR
- Dismissed16 October 20266009926Agricultural Building At Wraywick Farm, The Marshes, Southminster, CM0 7JN
- Dismissed14 October 20266009639Land Adjacent Howells Farm Cottages, Maypole Road, Great Totham, CM9 4SY
- Allowed16 September 2026601290643 Main Road, St Lawrence, Chelmsford, CM0 7LY
- Allowed18 August 20266005664Land West of Spratts Farm, Queenborough Road, Southminster, CM0 7AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®