Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 February 20233304563

27 South Street, Barming, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9EX

a new 'Mansard' roof construction with new bedroom and en-suite within new space over existing first floor and first floor existing dormer

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the surrounding area

What decided it

The mansard roof design would be a substantial and discordant feature that would create visual confusion and detract from the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and surrounding area.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP17, Policy DM30, Policy DM32

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.