Planning appeal decision
Shady Oaks , Eagle Road, Spalford, NG23 7HA
Planning appeal 3304814 at Shady Oaks , Eagle Road, Spalford, NG23 7HA (Newark & Sherwood District Council) was allowed on 7 February 2023 by Inspector Gilbert J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitably located with regard to proximity to services.
change of use of land to provide 4 pitches (1 static and 1 touring caravan and two parking spaces on each pitch) hardstanding and associated infrastructure for members of the Gypsy and Traveller community
- Authority
- Newark & Sherwood District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Gilbert J
- Postcode
- NG23 7HA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitably located with regard to proximity to services
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether any harm identified, including conflict with the development plan, would be outweighed by other considerations
What decided it
The significant unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches, the shortfall against the five-year pitch supply, and the absence of suitable alternative sites outweighed the identified harms.
The moderate harm to location/access to services and to character and appearance was clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to unmet pitch need, the shortfall in five-year pitch supply, and the lack of alternative sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- ACS Spatial Policy 1ACS Spatial Policy 3ACS Core Policy 4ACS Core Policy 5ACS Core Policy 13ADM Policy DM5ADM Policy DM8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 38Paragraph 47Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 62Paragraph 74Paragraph 105Paragraph 174
- Judgments
- North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment and Clover [1993] 65 P. & C.R. 137; Dunster Properties Ltd v First Secretary of State [2007] EWCA Civ 236; Smith v SSLUHC & Others [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Newark and Sherwood
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed14 January 20266001425Land off St Michael's Close, Halam, Southwell, Notts, NG22 8AR
- Allowed4 December 20253364181Land North of Main Road, Kelham, Nottinghamshire, NG23 5QY
- Allowed15 May 20253344502Land at Knapthorpe Lodge, Hockerton Road, Caunton, NG23 6BA
- Allowed15 May 20253344500Field Reference 2227, Hockerton Road, Caunton, NG23 6BA
- Allowed20 December 20243345687Field NO.2587, Southwell Road, Oxton Hill, Southwell, Nottinghamshire, NG25 0RN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®