Planning appeal decision
Woodlands Heights , Vanbrugh Hill, London, SE3 7EL
Planning appeal 3304828 at Woodlands Heights , Vanbrugh Hill, London, SE3 7EL (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 22 September 2023 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to an increased sense of enclosure to 6 Lasseter Place and 31 Vanbrugh Hill and loss of privacy, noise and disturbance and light spillage to adjacent residential properties.
Proposed extension to existing 5-storey building to provide an additional floor of residential floorspace comprising of 2 x 1 bedroom and 6 x 2 bedroom flats, with two roof terraces. (This application may affect the setting of the Westcombe Park and Greenwich Park Conservation Areas). (Re- consultation, Amended Description)
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- SE3 7EL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to an increased sense of enclosure to 6 Lasseter Place and 31 Vanbrugh Hill and loss of privacy, noise and disturbance and light spillage to adjacent residential properties
- traffic stress to the local highway network and harm to highway safety
- the character and appearance of the host property and the area, including the setting of the Westcombe Park Conservation Area and the East Greenwich Conservation Area
What decided it
The harm to neighbouring living conditions from increased sense of enclosure and noise and disturbance from roof terraces, combined with increased highway safety risks from intensified vehicle movements within a constrained shared access, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery and building improvement.
The benefits of 8 dwellings, efficient use of previously developed land, economic benefits, improved building appearance and cycle parking provision (moderate weight) were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of harm to neighbouring living conditions and highway safety when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D13Policy D14Policy D3Policy D4Policy HC1Policy T4Policy T2Policy DH(b)Policy DH(h)Policy DH1Policy DH3Policy E(a)Policy H5Policy IM(b)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 112
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld5 June 20263362770Land to Rear of East Greenwich Fire Station, Ramac Way, Charlton, London, SE7 7AX
- Allowed28 May 202660052006 Saunders Road, Plumstead, London, SE18 1NU
- Dismissed13 April 2026600295258 St Margarets Terrace,, London,, SE18 7RN
- Dismissed13 April 20266001278The Observatory Building, Green Hill, Off Repository Road, Woolwich, SE18 4BN
- Allowed20 March 2026333864218, Trafalgar Grove, Greenwich , London , SE10 9TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®