Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 October 20233305059

Land east of Lynsted Lane, Teynham, ME9 9QN

the erection of up to 10no. residential dwellings with associated landscaping, road layout and parking

Authority
Swale Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Shearing C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be suitably located in terms of its accessibility to services and facilities
  • Whether the proposal would comply with the Council's settlement strategy

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply triggered the presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the substantial benefits of delivering up to ten homes on a medium-sized site with good accessibility outweighed the significant harm of conflicting with the settlement strategy.

The significant harm from conflict with the settlement strategy was outweighed by the substantial benefits of housing delivery (addressing the identified shortfall in land supply), the site's edge-of-settlement location with good accessibility to services and facilities by sustainable transport, and economic benefits, applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d).

Framework references: 11, 49

Plan policies cited: Policy ST1, Policy ST3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.