Planning appeal decision
Land east of Lynsted Lane, Teynham, ME9 9QN
the erection of up to 10no. residential dwellings with associated landscaping, road layout and parking
- Authority
- Swale Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Shearing C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be suitably located in terms of its accessibility to services and facilities
- Whether the proposal would comply with the Council's settlement strategy
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply triggered the presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the substantial benefits of delivering up to ten homes on a medium-sized site with good accessibility outweighed the significant harm of conflicting with the settlement strategy.
The significant harm from conflict with the settlement strategy was outweighed by the substantial benefits of housing delivery (addressing the identified shortfall in land supply), the site's edge-of-settlement location with good accessibility to services and facilities by sustainable transport, and economic benefits, applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d).
Framework references: 11, 49
Plan policies cited: Policy ST1, Policy ST3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®