Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 January 20233305178

Land to the east of May Walk, May Walk, Stansted, CM24 8ST

formation of earth bunds and timber gates to secure land

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The accuracy of the submitted plans
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on protected species

What decided it

The development would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the countryside without sufficient justification, and no ecological assessment was submitted to demonstrate acceptable effects on protected species.

Framework references: 43, 174, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy S7, Policy GEN2, Policy GEN7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.