Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 April 20233305284

Area of Footpath, Sydenham Hill, Upper Sydenham, London, SE23 3PP

described on the application form as “5G telecoms installation: H3G Phase 8 high street pole c/w wrap-around cabinet and; and 3 further additional equipment cabinets

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Cross D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with due regard to the Forest Hill Conservation Area, and the consideration of alternative sites

What decided it

The significant visual harm to the character and appearance of the area and the Conservation Area, combined with the inadequate consideration of alternative sites that could deliver the same benefits with less visual impact, outweighed the public benefits of improved 5G coverage.

Framework references: 114, 117

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy 15, Core Strategy Policy 16, DM Policy 30, DM Policy 35, DM Policy 36, DM Policy 39

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.