Planning appeal decision
Land on the West Side of Sandybridge Lane, Shafton, Barnsley, S72 8PL
Planning appeal 3305546 at Land on the West Side of Sandybridge Lane, Shafton, Barnsley, S72 8PL (Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 10 March 2025 by Inspector Madge M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the locality.
Without planning permission, the material change of use of the Land for: i. The siting of caravans for human habitation with associated infrastructure (as marked in Appendix 1). ii. Importation of a skip and a shipping container (as marked in Appendix 1) iii. The storage of vehicles (as marked in Appendix 1) as well as other miscellaneous items and general detritus iv. The erection of outbuildings (as marked in Appendix 1) v. The erection of gates, walls, and fences (as marked in Appendix 1)
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Madge M
- Postcode
- S72 8PL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the locality
- The effect of the development on highway safety
- The effect of the development on neighbouring occupiers' living conditions
- The effect of the development in terms of flood risk
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policy
- If the development is inappropriate, its effect on openness
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate development in the Green Belt
What decided it
The development satisfied paragraph 155 of the Framework (grey belt land, demonstrable unmet need, sustainable location) and was therefore not inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
The development is not inappropriate development in the Green Belt, there is a demonstrable need for it, and any limited harm can be mitigated by conditions, so the development accords with the development plan taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GD1Policy D1Policy T4Policy Poll1Policy GB3Policy GT1Policy GT2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
- Judgments
- Miller-Mead v MHLG [1963] 2 WLR 225; Lisa Smith judgement
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Barnsley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 2026336421036 Littleworth Lane, Monk Bretton, Barnsley, S71 2JR
- Dismissed25 February 2026337243881 Swallow Hill Road, Low Barugh, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 1LY
- Dismissed10 October 20253369722Stancliffe Farm House, Woodhead Rad, Wortley, South Yorkshire, S35 7DA
- Notice varied and upheld14 July 20253327125Land on the East Side of Haigh Lane, Holyandswaine, S36 7JQ
- Allowed2 July 20253355889Worsbrough Equestrian, Worsbrough Road, Worsbrough, Barnsley, S70 5LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®