Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision3 August 20233305862

80 Westborough Road, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 4AS

a ‘single storey side/rear extension, alterations to the roof to include; x1 side rooflight and x1 rear dormer, detached rear annexe and alterations to fenestration

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the property
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties, with respect to light

What decided it

The rear dormer's incongruous positioning extending above the existing roof ridge conflicted with design quality requirements, whereas the extension and annexe were subservient additions that did not harm character or neighbouring amenities.

Plan policies cited: Policy QP3, Principle 10.5 Borough Wide Design Guide, Principle 10.1 Borough Wide Design Guide

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.