Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 May 20233305940

27 Richmond Crescent, Islington , LONDON, N1 0LY

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barnsbury Conservation Area, including with regard to trees
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to light and sense of enclosure relating to the rear extension

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the Barnsbury Conservation Area caused by the bulky and conspicuous roof and rear extensions outweighed the limited public benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS8 of the Islington Core Strategy (2011), Policy CS9 of the Islington Core Strategy (2011), Policy DM2.1 of the Development Management Policies (2013), Policy DM2.3 of the Development Management Policies (2013), Policy D1 of the London Plan, Policy D4 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.