Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 February 20233306124

Sutton Post Office, 1 Tunnicliffe Road, Sutton, Macclesfield, SK11 0EB

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Bayliss G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • If inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The considerable weight afforded to the development's contribution to maintaining the viability of the only retail store serving the ward, combined with strong community support and tourism benefits, clearly outweighed the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, establishing very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy PG10, Policy MP1, Policy SD1, Policy SD2, Policy SE1, Policy GEN1, Policy ENV5, Policy RET4, Policy EG2, Policy EG4, Policy REC5, Policy PG9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.