Planning appeal decision
Arundene Orchard, Loxwood Road, Rudgwick, RH12 3BT
Planning appeal 3306347 at Arundene Orchard, Loxwood Road, Rudgwick, RH12 3BT (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 2 November 2023 by Inspector Moore J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for new housing, with particular regard to the accessibility of necessary services and facilities.
construction of detached dwelling with detached double garage
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Moore J
- Postcode
- RH12 3BT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for new housing, with particular regard to the accessibility of necessary services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar Site, with particular regard to water neutrality
What decided it
The proposal would have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar Site, which forms a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11d) i of the Framework.
The benefits of housing delivery and previously developed land use, including the self-build element and lifetime home purpose, were outweighed by the poor accessibility of the location for necessary services and facilities and the unresolved adverse effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley Sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2 HDPFPolicy 3 HDPFPolicy 4 HDPFPolicy 26 HDPFPolicy 31 HDPFPolicy 16 HDPFPolicy 33 HDPFPolicy RNP1 Rudgwick Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2031
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 179Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bramshill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2021] EWCA Civ 320; Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 610; Dartford Borough Council v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 141
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed15 October 20266012640The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
- Dismissed23 September 20266006961Spring Acres, West End Lane, Henfield, BN5 9RE
- Dismissed18 September 20266009474Sussex Topiary,, Naldretts Lane,, Rudgwick, Horsham,, RH12 3BU
- Allowed10 September 20266009593Land East of Spring Gardens, Washington, RH20 3BP
- Dismissed14 July 202660082071 Hilltop Cottages, The Mount, Ifield, RH11 0LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®