Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20233306694

Land At Gloucester Road , Stratton, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 2LJ

Planning appeal 3306694 at Land At Gloucester Road , Stratton, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 2LJ (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 6 November 2023 by Inspector Ayres J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the location of the site within the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

provision of a new secure roadside truck stop facility, including associated HGV and car parking, drivers facilities building, vehicular access, service yard and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Ayres J
Postcode
GL7 2LJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the location of the site within the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • Whether the proposal would satisfy paragraph 177 of the Framework, namely whether there is a need for the development; whether there is scope to develop outside of the AONB, or to meet any identified need in some other way; the extent to which any detrimental effect on the environment, the landscape and recreational opportunities could be moderated; and whether the findings in respect of the aforementioned issues would culminate in exceptional circumstances, and that the development would be in the public interest

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate the exceptional circumstances required by paragraph 177 of the Framework, including that the need could not be met outside the AONB, given the significant harm identified to the landscape and tranquillity of the AONB.

The great weight attributable to conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB, together with significant harm from conflict with paragraph 177, outweighed the limited economic and very limited biodiversity net gain benefits, so the planning balance fell against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN2Policy EN4Policy EN5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 177Paragraph 176Paragraph 174Paragraph 106Paragraph 81Paragraph 109
Judgments
Luton Borough Council v Central Bedfordshire Council v Houghton Regis Development Consortium, Lands Improvement Holdings Limited, Landmatch Limited, Fiends of Life Limited, St Albans Diocesan Property Company Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 537, 2015 WL 2369975

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

20 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cotswold

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010613
    Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
  2. Allowed30 September 20266009635
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266009631
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
  4. Allowed5 June 20266002934
    Land East Of Cotswold Business Village, South of London Road, Moreton-in-Marsh, GL56 0JQ
  5. Allowed11 February 20263372305
    Ampney Park, Ampney Crucis, Cirencester, GL7 5RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.