Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20233307153

77 Woodmere Avenue, CROYDON, CR0 7PX

demolition of single family dwelling and garage to facilitate the erection of a detached 2-storey building with accommodation in the roof space, comprising of 7 self-contained apartments with intergraded bike store and 8 off street car parking spaces

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would provide suitable amenity space for Flat 3
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring residents in respect of light, outlook and privacy
  • Car parking, highway safety and sustainable transport
  • The provision of refuse and recycling storage

What decided it

The proposal fails on multiple material grounds including inadequate amenity space, unacceptable design harm to character and appearance, significant adverse effects on neighbouring living conditions, insufficient car parking provision with highway safety concerns, and non-compliant refuse storage location.

Framework references: 57

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D10 of the Local Plan, Policy DM10 of the Local Plan, Policy D4 of the London Plan, Policy DM10.1 of the Local Plan, Policy D3 of the London Plan, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan, Policy T4 of the London Plan, Policy T6 of the London Plan, Policy DM29 of the Local Plan, Policy DM30 of the Local Plan, Policy T5 of the London Plan, Policy DM13 of the Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.