Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 May 20233307343

289 London Road, Ewell, Epsom, KT17 2BZ

Planning appeal 3307343 at 289 London Road, Ewell, Epsom, KT17 2BZ (Epsom and Ewell Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 May 2023 by Inspector Moore J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.

Erection of 3-bedroom detached dwelling following the demolition of existing garage (amended scheme)

Authority
Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moore J
Postcode
KT17 2BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of internal space

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance through overdevelopment and loss of open gaps between buildings, combined with failure to meet internal space standards, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery in the context of housing land supply shortfall.

The adverse impacts on character and appearance and living conditions would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the proposal (housing delivery and economic benefits) when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS5Policy DM9Policy DM10Policy DM12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 219
Judgments
North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 65 P & CR 137; R (Midcounties Co-Operative Limited) v Forest of Dean District Council [2017] EWHC 2050; Baroness Cumberlege v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2017] EWHC 2057

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

209 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epsom and Ewell Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed29 October 20266011091
    20 Bradford Drive, Ewell, KT19 0AH
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266004732
    57-61 High Street, Ewell, KT17 1RX
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266010565
    Land To The Rear Of 11 Ruxley Close,, West Ewell, KT19 9ND
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266006401
    11 Danetree Road, West Ewell, KT19 9SA
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds30 July 20263361942
    The Land Known As 11 Woodlands Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.