®Planning appeal decision
Dismissed27 January 20233307590
166 Sidcup Road, London, SE12 9AJ
a simple, basic, straightforward, typical, common, regular extension - adding additional 4.5m to the length of the property
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Nilsson A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development satisfies the requirements of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 with regard to being permitted development under the above Order
- If so, whether planning permission is deemed to have been granted
- If planning permission is not deemed to have been granted, whether the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of any adjoining premises is such as to require refusal of prior approval
What decided it
The appellant provided inconsistent and insufficient information to enable the Inspector to establish whether the proposed development complies with the requirements and limitations of the General Permitted Development Order 2015.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.