Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20233308423

51 Charlton Church Lane, London, SE7 7AE

Planning appeal 3308423 at 51 Charlton Church Lane, London, SE7 7AE (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 7 July 2023 by Inspector Moore J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of bedrooms 1 and 2 of units R2 and R3, with particular regard to outlook and privacy.

subdivision of the entire site into seven (7) residential units (Use Class C3), proposed retention of all structures on site, proposed re- instatement of front lightwell, part-retrospective loft conversion incorporating installation of three (3) and rooflights to the main building [existing rear mansard extension to be replaced], excavation and lowering of floor level of rear extension building to allow for an additional storey, and other associated external alterations and landscaping works (Resubmission)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moore J
Postcode
SE7 7AE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of bedrooms 1 and 2 of units R2 and R3, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No.47 Charlton Church Lane, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The unacceptable outlook and privacy conditions for future occupiers of bedrooms 1 and 2 of units R2 and R3, combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring privacy, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing supply and land use benefits.

The adverse impacts of unacceptable harm to living conditions of both future occupiers and neighbouring occupiers were given considerable and overriding weight and significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply and effective use of land, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development was not engaged.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London PlanPolicy H5 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies 2014Policy DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies 2014Policy DH(b) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies 2014
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 134Paragraph 219
Judgments
Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

309 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  2. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
  3. Unknown14 July 20263374853
    Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
  4. Dismissed6 July 20263376767
    2-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
  5. Allowed19 June 20266000585
    278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.