Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 July 20233308448

Barlands Cottage, Land west of the B4214, Bosbury, HR8 1HB

renovation and repair of the existing cottage building to a functional residential dwelling and the addition of a single storey side extensi on with associated car parking, landscaping and access track

Authority
Herefordshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Thandi B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the existing structure on the appeal site constitutes a dwelling
  • Whether the proposed development would be a suitable location for new housing having regard to local and national planning policies
  • Whether the proposal would represent an appropriate means of conserving Barlands Cottage as a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The proposal represents an isolated new home in the countryside meeting paragraph 80(b) of the NPPF as the optimal viable use of a heritage asset, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development outweighs the conflict with the development plan.

The conflict with development plan policies SS1, RA2, RA3 and RA5 was given limited weight, and the significant benefits of housing supply and conservation of a non-designated heritage asset, together with the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 80 of the NPPF, outweighed the adverse impacts.

Framework references: 80, 219, 54

Plan policies cited: Policy RA2, Policy RA3, Policy RA5, Policy SS1

Judgments cited: Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; Bramshill Ltd v SSHCLG [2021] EWCA Civ 320

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.