Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20233308451

14 Elm Road, Sidcup, DA14 6AD

Planning appeal 3308451 at 14 Elm Road, Sidcup, DA14 6AD (London Borough of Bexley) was dismissed on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Nilsson A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of The Green Conservation Area.

a part single storey side and part two storey rear extension, roof alteration with rear dormer with rear and side roof lights, together with the conversion of 8-bedroom sui generis use class into C3 use class, 4 self-contained flats with associated refuse storage, bicycle storage, landscaping and 2 car parking spaces

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Nilsson A
Postcode
DA14 6AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of The Green Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of 16 Elm Road in terms of outlook
  • Whether the proposed development provides acceptable living conditions for future occupants with specific regard to outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the conservation area, living conditions of neighbouring residents, and failure to demonstrate safe parking operations outweighed the moderate benefits of providing additional residential units in a sustainable location.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ENV39ENV46HC1D4H7D6T16G18CS15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

131 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bexley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed2 October 20266012368
    35 Cumberland Drive, Bexleyheath, DA7 5LA
  2. Dismissed10 August 20266010686
    29 Perry Street, Crayford, DA1 4RB
  3. Allowed20 July 20266007892
    120 Northumberland Avenue, Bexley, Welling, DA16 2PZ
  4. Allowed12 June 20266005537
    Land Adjacent to 11 Black Horse Road, Sidcup, London, DA14 6ET
  5. Dismissed22 May 20266004832
    Land Rear Of, 447 Hurst Road, Bexley, DA5 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.