Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 November 20233308631

Area of Footpath, Pier Way, Greenwich , Greater London, SE28 0GP

Planning appeal 3308631 at Area of Footpath, Pier Way, Greenwich , Greater London, SE28 0GP (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 17 November 2023 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposals upon the character and appearance of the area.

Proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
SE28 0GP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposals upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Pedestrian safety
  • Whether International Commission guidelines are met, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The harmful effect of the siting and appearance on the character and appearance of the area, combined with unacceptable harm to pedestrian safety and failure to demonstrate that suitable alternative sites had been properly considered, outweighed any benefits of the installation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DH(c)Policy DH1Policy IM4Policy IM(b)Policy D3Policy D8Policy T2Policy T4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 112Paragraph 115Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

234 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed4 July 20253350920
    O/S 546-550 Westhorne Avenue, London, SE9 6DR
  2. Allowed4 July 20253350919
    O/S 546-550 Westhorne Avenue, London, SE9 6DR
  3. Allowed12 July 20243335657
    Land at Mottingham Station, Court Road, Mottingham, London, SE9 4EW
  4. Dismissed27 November 20233320872
    Aldi Car Park, Kidbrooke Park Road, London, SE3 9BY
  5. Dismissed27 November 20233307432
    Pavement O/S Premier Inn London Woolwich (Royal Arsenal Hotel), Beresford Street, , London, SE18 6BF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.