Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20233308946

Northern Star House, 130 and 132 High Road, London, N11 1PG

Planning appeal 3308946 at Northern Star House, 130 and 132 High Road, London, N11 1PG (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 26 June 2023 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area.

two new residential apartments to the rear of the existing building, one new single person apartment set within the existing building recess at first floor level and one new one bedroom two person apartment at second floor, all built within the existing building ground floor footprint

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lancaster K
Postcode
N11 1PG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal access arrangements, provision of internal accommodation, external amenity space, daylight and outlook

What decided it

The proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the host property and area through its discordant appearance, scale and massing, and would fail to provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers due to inadequate internal space, single-aspect design, limited daylight and outlook, and insufficient external amenity space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
GG2D3D4D8CP30DMD6DMD8DMD37D6H6DMD9CP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

462 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.