Planning appeal decision
86a Houndsfield Lane, Hollywood, Solihull, Worcestershire, B90 1PS
replacement dwelling
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, together with the pragmatic assessment that the replacement dwelling would not be materially larger than the building it replaced, clearly outweighed the harm to the Green Belt and openness.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness, given substantial weight, were clearly outweighed by the lack of five-year housing land supply and the pragmatic assessment of the replacement dwelling as not materially larger than its predecessor, constituting very special circumstances.
Framework references: 149
Plan policies cited: Policy BDP4, Policy BDP2
Judgments cited: Athlone House Ltd v SSCLG [2015] EWHC 3524 (Admin); Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®