Planning appeal decision
Garages Adjacent to 161-163 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 3LP
Planning appeal 3309367 at Garages Adjacent to 161-163 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 3LP (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 3 May 2023 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of existing garages and erection of a 3-storey building comprising 9 no. residential units with car parking, bin/cycle storage and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- McDonagh C
- Postcode
- N21 3LP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether proposal would provide suitable living conditions to future occupiers of the dwellings
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of No. 163 Hoppers Road
- Highway safety and provision of vehicle and cycle parking
- Whether the proposal includes suitable arrangements for surface water drainage
What decided it
The adverse impacts of the proposal on character and appearance, living conditions for future and neighbouring occupiers, highway safety, parking provision, and drainage arrangements significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of nine additional dwellings, even under the tilted balance applicable to a Council with insufficient housing land supply.
The benefits of nine dwellings on a brownfield site with a suitable mix of unit types, worthy of significant weight, were outweighed by the substantial harms to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupants, failure to maintain highway safety, unsuitable parking and cycle provision, and undemonstrated drainage management, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CP30DMD6DMD8DMD37DMD81DMD9CP4DMD45DMD46DMD47CP25DMD61CP21D3D4D8G5G7D6T6T6.1T4T5SI13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 167Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®