Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 May 20233309367

Garages Adjacent to 161-163 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 3LP

Planning appeal 3309367 at Garages Adjacent to 161-163 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 3LP (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 3 May 2023 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing garages and erection of a 3-storey building comprising 9 no. residential units with car parking, bin/cycle storage and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
N21 3LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether proposal would provide suitable living conditions to future occupiers of the dwellings
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of No. 163 Hoppers Road
  • Highway safety and provision of vehicle and cycle parking
  • Whether the proposal includes suitable arrangements for surface water drainage

What decided it

The adverse impacts of the proposal on character and appearance, living conditions for future and neighbouring occupiers, highway safety, parking provision, and drainage arrangements significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of nine additional dwellings, even under the tilted balance applicable to a Council with insufficient housing land supply.

The benefits of nine dwellings on a brownfield site with a suitable mix of unit types, worthy of significant weight, were outweighed by the substantial harms to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupants, failure to maintain highway safety, unsuitable parking and cycle provision, and undemonstrated drainage management, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP30DMD6DMD8DMD37DMD81DMD9CP4DMD45DMD46DMD47CP25DMD61CP21D3D4D8G5G7D6T6T6.1T4T5SI13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 167Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

500 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.