Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld15 December 20233309488

The land building(s) known as 278 Philip Lane, LONDON, N15 4AD

the unauthorised installation of UPVC windows on the front, side and rear elevations at the first and second floor level of the building

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice was properly served
  • Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach
  • Whether the time given to comply with the notice is too short

What decided it

The compliance period of three months was insufficient to allow the appellant to obtain necessary planning permission and other approvals before carrying out the removal works, justifying a variation to six months.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.