Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20233309605

Clock Parade, London Road, Enfield, EN2 6JG

Planning appeal 3309605 at Clock Parade, London Road, Enfield, EN2 6JG (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 2 October 2023 by Inspector Johnson W, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether satisfactory accommodation would be provided for future occupiers of the scheme, with particular regard to outlook, ventilation and the outdoor play area.

the redevelopment of site including part demolition and rebuild to create a four-storey building and a part five/part two storey building to comprise 41 net additional residential units with commercial floorspace at ground floor level, an enlarged basement car park, associated refuse and cycle storage and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Johnson W
Postcode
EN2 6JG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether satisfactory accommodation would be provided for future occupiers of the scheme, with particular regard to outlook, ventilation and the outdoor play area
  • the need for and provision of affordable housing, having regard to the financial viability of the development
  • the effect of the proposed development, with regard to flood risk and surface water drainage
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
  • whether the proposed development would be acceptable in terms of its transport and highways impacts, with particular regard to vehicular parking

What decided it

The cumulative harm from inadequate play space provision, failure to contribute to affordable housing despite apparent viability margin, and unresolved flood risk concerns outweighed the housing supply benefits and presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The social benefits of housing supply contribution and economic benefits during construction did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the harm created by inadequate play area provision, no affordable housing contribution, and unresolved drainage and flood risk concerns.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy S4London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy H4London Plan Policy H5London Plan Policy H6London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1London Plan Policy SI 12London Plan Policy SI 13Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP4Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP3Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP21Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP28Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP30Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP24Enfield Development Management Document Policy DM8Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD1Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD 61Enfield Development Management Document Policy DM8Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD 37Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD45Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD47
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 34Paragraph 57Paragraph 58

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

377 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.