Planning appeal decision
Bishops Stortford Community Sports Club, Cricketfield Lane, Bishops Stortford, Herts, CM23 2TD
Planning appeal 3309640 at Bishops Stortford Community Sports Club, Cricketfield Lane, Bishops Stortford, Herts, CM23 2TD (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 25 October 2023 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Extensions, Refurbishment and Part Change of Use (F2(b)/Sui Generis to C3-Groundsman's Flat) to Charles Edwards Community Pavilion, Extension to Carpark and Extension to Cricketers Changing Pavilion (to form Umpire changing facility)
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Plenty B
- Postcode
- CM23 2TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether any harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it
What decided it
The inclusion of a two-bedroom groundsman's flat, which cannot be justified as an exception under paragraph 149(b) of the Framework, renders the proposal as a whole inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the harm to the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
The benefits of enhanced sports facilities, improved security, and energy efficiency measures were given limited to moderate weight in favour of the proposal, but these did not clearly outweigh the substantial weight to be given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and modest harm to openness, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- GBR1TRA3CFLR1CFLR7DES5SP1SP2SLCP2SLCP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed14 October 2026601275023 Bishops Road, Tewin Wood, Tewin, AL6 0NP
- Dismissed28 September 20266006224Land Near Fanshawes Ware Park, Ware, SG12 0DX
- Dismissed25 September 20266006716Little Orchard, London Road, Spellbrook, Hertfordshire, CM23 4BA
- Allowed24 September 20266008238Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®