Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 May 20233310166

Area of Footpath at Macclesfield Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 6BE

Planning appeal 3310166 at Area of Footpath at Macclesfield Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 6BE (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 May 2023 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.

a 5G 17m telecoms installation: H3G street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hughes L
Postcode
SK7 6BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of occupiers of adjacent properties with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on highway safety
  • if any harm is identified, whether this would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety was not sufficiently outweighed by a demonstration of lack of alternative sites, and the appellant failed to adequately assess and discount alternative options.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy policy SIE-1Core Strategy policy SIE-3Core Strategy policy SIE-5Core Strategy policy CS9Core Strategy policy CS10Core Strategy policy T-1Core Strategy policy T-3Radio Telecommunication Development Supplementary Planning Guidance (RTD SPG)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 118Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 131Paragraph 134Paragraph 104Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 112

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266008381
    15 St Matthews Road, Edgeley, Stockport, SK3 9EZ
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266011394
    11 Hyde Road, Stockport, SK6 1QG
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266010632
    315-317 London Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 4PS
  4. Allowed16 March 20263366984
    Land To Rear Of 12 Heathcote Avenue, Heaton Norris, Stockport, SK4 2QF
  5. Notice varied and upheld19 February 20263360424
    31 Arundel Avenue, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 5LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.