Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 December 20233310188

Land north of Gilberts Wood, Ewyas Harold, Hereford, HR2 0JB

residential development of up to 25 houses

Authority
Herefordshire Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Reed D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would comprise an acceptable location for development having regard to the provisions of the development plan
  • whether the highway access arrangements would be acceptable, in particular pedestrian accessibility to local services
  • the landscape and visual effects of the proposal

What decided it

The unacceptable highway access arrangements, particularly the unsatisfactory pedestrian accessibility to local services which would discourage walking and create highway safety concerns, combined with the lack of clear quantitative need for the development, meant the proposal did not meet the NDP Policy EH1 integration test.

The benefits of delivering 25 dwellings with 35% affordable housing and infrastructure contributions were outweighed by the unacceptable pedestrian accessibility to local services creating highway safety concerns, the lack of clear quantitative need given the Council's 6.19 years housing land supply and Ewyas Harold's progress towards its growth target, and the failure to meet the NDP integration test, particularly given the large Callowside scheme already under construction.

Plan policies cited: Policy RA1, Policy RA2, Policy EH1, Policy SS4, Policy MT1, Policy G6, Policy EH4, Policy LD1, Policy G1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.