Planning appeal decision
Land North of Bonningtons, Latchmore Bank, Little Hallingbury, Hertfordshire, CM22 7PH
Planning appeal 3310189 at Land North of Bonningtons, Latchmore Bank, Little Hallingbury, Hertfordshire, CM22 7PH (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 12 September 2023 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
construction of 9 residential dwellings and associated development
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- CM22 7PH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting of Grade II listed buildings
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and significant loss of openness, combined with harm to heritage assets and character, was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic gains.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt (inappropriateness, openness, and countryside encroachment) and less than substantial harm to heritage assets, together with harm to character and appearance, outweighed the moderate weight given to housing supply contribution, economic and social benefits, and ecological enhancements.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S6Policy GEN2Policy ENV3Policy S7Policy ENV2Policy GEN1(e)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Allowed15 January 20263373483Land Adj to Greylands Barn , Chelmsford Road, White Roding, Dunmow, CM6 1RF
- Dismissed13 January 20263373643Land Adj to South View, Maple Lane, Wimbish, Essex, CB10 2XG
- Dismissed23 September 20253364102Land South of Birchanger Lane , Birchanger Lane , Birchanger , Bishops Stortford
- Dismissed15 August 20253366933Lock Farm House Dell Lane, Spellbrook, Bishop's Stortford, CM22 7SG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®