Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 December 20233310279

Area of Grass Verge, Windmill Lane, Southall

5G 18m telecoms installation: H3G street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Unknown
Inspector
Harrison F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the setting of the St Marks and Canal Conservation Area and the nearby scheduled monument, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposed monopole would cause less than substantial harm to the setting and significance of designated heritage assets, and this harm was not outweighed by the public benefits of improved telecommunications coverage, particularly given that the appellant had not demonstrated the appeal site was the only viable alternative location.

Framework references: 118, 121

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy 7B, Policy 7C, Policy 7.4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.