Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 July 20233310386

174 Hailsham Avenue, LONDON, SW2 3AJ

enlarged rear dormer and replacement of rear window and set of doors

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Law T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and its surroundings, including the Leigham Court Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed development, despite its enlargement, would remain subordinate in appearance through its significant set-down from the ridgeline and would use matching materials, ensuring it would not harm the character and appearance of the host building or the conservation area.

Framework references: 130, 199

Plan policies cited: Policy Q5, Policy Q11, Policy Q22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.