Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20233310829

27 Roydene Road, LONDON, SE18 1PZ

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the local area, with reference to streetscene
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers, with reference to outlook and daylight

What decided it

The roof dormer extensions result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the appeal property and local area through their disproportionate scale and boxy design, and the rear extension causes significant harm to neighbouring living conditions through loss of outlook and daylight.

Framework references: 12, 130

Plan policies cited: DH1, DH(a), DH(b), DH(h), D3, D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.