Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20233310921

Flat 4, Reginald Place , 46-50 Deptford High Street, LONDON, SE8 4AE

installation of replacement double glazed uPVC window

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Deptford High Street and St Paul's Church Conservation Area

What decided it

The unsympathetic design of the proposed uPVC windows would fail to preserve or enhance the appearance of the conservation area, and the limited public benefits would not outweigh the harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset.

Framework references: 202, 211

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1 of the London Plan (adopted 2016), Policy 15 of the Lewisham Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (adopted 2011), Policy 16 of the Lewisham Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (adopted 2011), Policy 30 of the Development Management Local Plan (adopted 2014), Policy 31 of the Development Management Local Plan (adopted 2014), Policy 36 of the Development Management Local Plan (adopted 2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.