Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision4 August 20253311058

Chestnuts Farm, Eastcote Lane, Hampton-In-Arden, SOLIHULL, B92 0AS

Continued use of existing agricultural building for offices and workshops for Dovetail Group with associated vehicle parking and storage in 4 containers and screen fencing; Continued use of existing yard and building for waste recycling and ancillary skip hire – C & R Lewis - part of Dovetail Group. ___________________________________________________________________________________

Authority
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Curnow R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether this is a suitable location for a waste recycling facility in the light of development plan policies
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight attached to harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of development, combined with significant harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the moderate economic and social benefits claimed, meaning very special circumstances did not exist for the waste, offices and hardstanding/fencing elements; conversely, the track and bunds provided agricultural benefit that outweighed their limited harm to openness.

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of development, together with significant harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by moderate economic and social benefits for the waste recycling, skip hire and offices/workshops uses; however, for the track and bunds, the agricultural benefit to the farm enterprise outweighed the limited harm to openness.

Framework references: 11, 88, 110, 115, 143, 150, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy P3, Policy P12, Policy P15, Policy P17

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.