Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld4 August 20253311155

Chestnuts Farm, Eastcote Lane, Hampton-In-Arden, Solihull, B92 0AS

Planning appeal 3311155 at Chestnuts Farm, Eastcote Lane, Hampton-In-Arden, Solihull, B92 0AS (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 August 2025 by Inspector Curnow R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

Continued use of existing agricultural building for offices and workshops for Dovetail Group with associated vehicle parking and storage in 4 containers and screen fencing; Continued use of existing yard and building for waste recycling and ancillary skip hire – C & R Lewis - part of Dovetail Group. ___________________________________________________________________________________

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Curnow R
Postcode
B92 0AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether this is a suitable location for a waste recycling facility in the light of development plan policies
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight attached to harm to Green Belt openness and the failure to demonstrate that the benefits of the commercial uses clearly outweighed the identified harm meant that very special circumstances did not exist to justify the inappropriate development, except for the track and bund which provided agricultural benefits and landscape mitigation.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and loss of openness, combined with significant harm to character and appearance from the waste recycling, skip hire and office/parking uses, was not outweighed by the moderate economic and social benefits of farm diversification and employment creation; however, the limited harm from the agricultural track and the substantial landscape benefits of the bund were outweighed by their agricultural and screening benefits respectively.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P3Policy P12Policy P15Policy P17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 88Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 150Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Solihull

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266013961
    The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
  2. Allowed23 October 20266009733
    Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
  3. Planning permission granted28 September 20263371254
    95 Prospect Lane, Solihull, B91 1HS
  4. Notice upheld14 September 20263375302
    10 Park View, Hockley Heath, Solihull, B94 6PE
  5. Notice upheld14 September 20263375301
    10 Park View, Hockley Heath, Solihull, B94 6PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.