Planning appeal decision
Stonehouse Farm, Handcross Road, Plummers Plain, Horsham, RH13 6NZ
Planning appeal 3311244 at Stonehouse Farm, Handcross Road, Plummers Plain, Horsham, RH13 6NZ (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 27 March 2024 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether there is a recognised functional need for the mobile home.
Retrospective application for Replacement Agricultural Building’. Formal
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- RH13 6NZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: whether there is a recognised functional need for the mobile home
- Appeal A: whether the location of the mobile home would accord with the Council's spatial policy
- Appeal A: the development's effect upon the integrity of the internationally designated Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar sites by way of water abstraction
- Appeal C: whether there is an essential need for the replacement agricultural building in association with the agricultural operations of the farm
- Appeal C: if so, the effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area by way of the size of the new building
- Appeal C: the development's effect upon the integrity of the internationally designated Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar sites by way of water abstraction
What decided it
The absence of a water neutrality statement or mitigation measures to protect the Arun Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar sites was decisive in dismissing both the deemed planning application (Appeal A) and the retrospective building appeal (Appeal C).
In both Appeal A and Appeal C the failure to address water neutrality and its potential adverse effects on the Arun Valley protected sites outweighed the planning benefits (including the accepted agricultural need for the replacement building in Appeal C), leading to dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 20Policy 31Policy 1Policy 2Policy 4Policy 26Policy 10Policy 25Policy 32Policy 33
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Notice upheld16 September 20263373450Development Site Lot 3, Kent Street, Cowfold, West Sussex, RH13 8BB
- Notice varied and upheld15 September 2026335577812 Great Lime Kilns, Southwater, Horsham, RH13 9JL
- Notice upheld18 June 20263343866Pengarth, 11 Nightingales, West Chiltington, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 2QT
- Split Decision29 May 202633757682 Greenacres Farm West Chiltington Lane, Billingshurst, RH14 9DR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®