Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 May 20233311415

126 Brownspring Drive, LONDON, SE9 3LD

for a two-storey/first floor side/rear extension

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Willmer P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the architectural integrity of the host property and thereby the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed extension's design, particularly its total depth, unmodulated southern elevation, false pitched fascia detail and uncomfortable relationship with the main roof, would significantly detract from the architectural integrity of the host property and the character of the surrounding area, contrary to development plan policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (Adopted March 2021), Policy DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan-Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (Adopted 30 July 2014), Policy DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan-Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (Adopted 30 July 2014), Royal Borough Greenwich Residential Extensions, Basements and Conversions Guidance Supplementary Planning Document SPD (Adopted December 2018)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.