Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision17 February 20233311447

62 Park Lane, LONDON, N9 9BQ

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jarvis P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact on the living conditions in relation to loss of light and outlook of the occupiers of the adjoining property, No. 60 Park Lane

What decided it

The overbearing impact and loss of light to the adjoining property caused by the depth and height of the proposed extension relative to the small neighbouring garden and boundary fence.

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of the London Plan, Policy CP4 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010), Policy CP30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD11 of the Development Management Document (2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.