Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 September 20233311469

Land to Rear of 29 Renness Road, Waltham Forest, Walthamstow, London, E17 6EX

Planning appeal 3311469 at Land to Rear of 29 Renness Road, Waltham Forest, Walthamstow, London, E17 6EX (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 September 2023 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 29, 30 and 31 Renness Road with particular regard to privacy, outlook and light.

a four storey residential scheme to comprise of 4 no. new homes to form 1 no. 1B1P, 2 no. 2B3P and 1 no. 2B4P flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
E17 6EX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 29, 30 and 31 Renness Road with particular regard to privacy, outlook and light
  • Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for the future occupiers of the proposed flats with particular reference to their private internal and outside space
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether appropriate provision would be made for waste and recycling
  • The effects of the construction phase of the development upon local highways
  • Whether planning obligations are necessary to make the development acceptable and, if so, whether any necessary agreements have been entered into

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the privacy of neighbouring occupiers at 29, 30 and 31 Renness Road from overlooking by multiple storeys of accommodation, combined with the failure to provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers due to substandard internal and external space, could not be outweighed by the modest housing benefits.

The modest contribution to housing supply and redevelopment of a brownfield site were outweighed by the considerable adverse effects on neighbouring living conditions (privacy) and the failure to provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers; even applying paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, the adverse effects significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS2Policy CS4Policy CS6Policy CS7Policy CS13Policy CS15Policy DM2Policy DM7Policy DM10Policy DM11Policy DM13Policy DM16Policy DM23Policy DM24Policy DM29Policy DM30Policy DM32Policy DM36Policy D1Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy GG2Policy H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 120Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

354 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.