Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 September 20233311975

Bankside , Holt , BH21 7DX

side infill extension, creation of new upper floor and new garage

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rogers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing harmful loss of openness that would not be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and therefore very special circumstances required to justify approval have not been demonstrated.

Framework references: 11, 14, 138, 147, 149

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy GB3, Saved Policy GB8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.