Planning appeal decision
Bankside , Holt , BH21 7DX
side infill extension, creation of new upper floor and new garage
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Rogers J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing harmful loss of openness that would not be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and therefore very special circumstances required to justify approval have not been demonstrated.
Framework references: 11, 14, 138, 147, 149
Plan policies cited: Saved Policy GB3, Saved Policy GB8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®