Planning appeal decision
124 East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent, ME10 4RX
the erection of 2 bedroom bungalow
- Authority
- Swale Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Naylor R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The living conditions of nearby occupiers with specific regard to private amenity space, noise and disturbance, overlooking and privacy
- The living conditions of future occupiers
- The adjoining Air Quality Management Area (AQMA)
- The integrity of the Swale Special Protection Area (SPA)
What decided it
The substantial harm to character and appearance combined with unacceptable impacts on living conditions of both existing and future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.
The adverse impacts relating to character and appearance, living conditions of existing and future occupiers, and air quality concerns attracted substantial weight against the scheme, which significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate weight given to housing delivery benefits and other environmental, economic and social benefits.
Framework references: 135, 129, 11
Plan policies cited: CP3, CP4, DM14, DM6
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®