Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted29 January 20243312877

417 Archway Road, London, N6 4HU

Planning appeal 3312877 at 417 Archway Road, London, N6 4HU (London Borough of Haringey) was allowed on 29 January 2024 by Inspector Davies H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area.

without planning permission, the erection of a roof addition and parapet wall on the second storey roof to facilitate a dwelling

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Davies H
Postcode
N6 4HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area
  • The living conditions of occupants of neighbouring dwellings, with regard to outlook

What decided it

The development, assessed as built, does not cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area or to neighbouring living conditions, and therefore planning permission should be granted on the deemed application under ground (a).

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy DM6Policy DM9Policy SP11Policy SP12Policy D3Policy H1Policy DH5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

324 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263371938
    20 Croxford Gardens, Wood Green, London, N22 5QU
  2. Notice upheld23 September 20263365190
    37 Morrison Avenue, London, N17 6TU
  3. Planning permission granted24 August 20263367851
    Unit 3, Omega Works, 167 Hermitage Road, London, N4 1LZ
  4. decided12 August 20266006421
    251 Wightman Road, London, N8 0NB
  5. Notice upheld23 July 20263359207
    1 Inverness Terace, Sterling Road, London , N22 5BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.