®Planning appeal decision
1 Hyde Vale, Greenwich, SE10 8QG
Planning appeal 3312996 at 1 Hyde Vale, Greenwich, SE10 8QG (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was allowed on 28 April 2023 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect that varying condition 2 would have on the setting of 63 Royal Hill, a Grade II listed building.
an application submitted under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for a minor material amendment in connection with the planning permission 18/2743/MA dated 29/01/2019 to allow the variation of condition 2 (approved plans); the variation of condition 7 (CO2 emissions); the variation of condition 13 (accessible and adaptable dwellings); and the variation of condition 20 (number of residential units) without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 18/2743/MA, dated 29 January 2019
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
- Postcode
- SE10 8QG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect that varying condition 2 would have on the setting of 63 Royal Hill, a Grade II listed building
- The effect that varying condition 2 would have on the living conditions of the occupiers of 31 and 33 King George Street, with particular regard to outlook and sense of enclosure
What decided it
The cumulative public benefits of the scheme, particularly housing delivery in an area without a five-year housing land supply, were found sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed building.
The significant public benefits (housing delivery, sustainability measures, improved living conditions and structural benefits) were found to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed building.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1Policy DH3Policy DH(i)Policy DH(b)Policy 5.2Policy E1Policy 3.8Policy H5Policy T6Policy IM(c)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 196Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed30 September 2026600747044 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
- Dismissed14 July 20263375007Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
- Unknown14 July 20263374853Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
- Dismissed6 July 202633767672-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
- Allowed19 June 20266000585278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.