Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 April 20233312996

1 Hyde Vale, Greenwich, SE10 8QG

an application submitted under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for a minor material amendment in connection with the planning permission 18/2743/MA dated 29/01/2019 to allow the variation of condition 2 (approved plans); the variation of condition 7 (CO2 emissions); the variation of condition 13 (accessible and adaptable dwellings); and the variation of condition 20 (number of residential units) without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 18/2743/MA, dated 29 January 2019

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that varying condition 2 would have on the setting of 63 Royal Hill, a Grade II listed building
  • The effect that varying condition 2 would have on the living conditions of the occupiers of 31 and 33 King George Street, with particular regard to outlook and sense of enclosure

What decided it

The cumulative public benefits of the scheme, particularly housing delivery in an area without a five-year housing land supply, were found sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed building.

The significant public benefits (housing delivery, sustainability measures, improved living conditions and structural benefits) were found to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed building.

Framework references: 202, 196, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy DH3, Policy DH(i), Policy DH(b), Policy 5.2, Policy E1, Policy 3.8, Policy H5, Policy T6, Policy IM(c)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.