Planning appeal decision
Land at Chapelfield, Oakhill, Radstock, BA3 5AU
Planning appeal 3313162 at Land at Chapelfield, Oakhill, Radstock, BA3 5AU (Mendip District Council *) was dismissed on 22 May 2023 by Inspector Partington A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
residential development of 26 dwellings, including 30% affordable housing, together with associated landscaping, parking, access, sustainable urban drainage system (SuDS) and any other associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Mendip District Council *
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Partington A
- Postcode
- BA3 5AU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the nearby residents with particular regard to privacy, outlook and loss of sunlight
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, combined with only moderate weight being given to the housing benefits because Oakhill had already exceeded its proportionate growth allocation, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The significant adverse impacts, including conflict with the development plan and harm to character and appearance, were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefits of housing delivery and other limited benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development was not engaged
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1Core Policy 2Core Policy 4Policy DP1Policy DP7Policy DP11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mendip District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed7 March 20253348485Cheddar Valley Inn, 22 Tucker Street, Wells, Somerset, BA5 2DZ
- Allowed22 November 20243340886Land to the North of Wallbridge Gardens, Frome, Somerset, BA11 1RJ
- Allowed10 October 20243335782Bell Inn, 13 Frome Road, Rode, BA11 6PW
- Dismissed3 July 20243314693Former Greencore Factory, Prestleigh Road, Evercreech, BA4 6JZ
- Split Decision21 February 20243312171Church Farm, Frome Road, Rode, BA11 6PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®