Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 March 20233313277

95 Mckinnell Crescent, RUGBY, CV21 4AU

retrospective application for a single-storey rear extension to the property

Authority
Rugby Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the original dwelling
  • The residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers with regard to sense of enclosure and overbearingness, loss of privacy and loss of light

What decided it

The extension's excessive scale, massing, and raised platform create unacceptable overbearing impact and loss of privacy for neighbouring occupiers whilst being uncharacteristic and disproportionate to the host dwelling.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy SDC1, Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.