Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 July 20243313302

Land at 96 Kingsway, West Wickham, BR4 9JQ

without planning permission, the erection of a first-floor rear extension measuring approximately 3m in depth and 4.5m in width above an existing 6m deep single storey extension and the erection of a two-storey side extension exceeding 3m in height within 2m of a side boundary

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the extensions on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area
  • The effect on the living conditions enjoyed by existing and future occupiers of neighbouring residential property, having regard to outlook
  • Whether the period specified for complying with the requirements of the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed

What decided it

The extensions cause unacceptable harm to character and appearance through their incompatible design, scale and form, conflicting with the Development Plan with no material considerations to outweigh this harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy 8, Policy 6, Policy 37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.