Planning appeal decision
Anchor Inn, Bradford Street, Birmingham, B5 6ET
Planning appeal 3313535 at Anchor Inn, Bradford Street, Birmingham, B5 6ET (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 28 July 2023 by Inspector Bayliss G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses, and whether it would preserve the significance of the heritage asset.
the erection of replacement digital 'D-Poster' advertisement hoarding
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- advert · Advertisement Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Bayliss G
- Postcode
- B5 6ET
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses, and whether it would preserve the significance of the heritage asset
- Appeal B: The effect of the advertisement on visual amenity, having regard to the building's listed status
What decided it
The visual prominence and jarring nature of the proposed digital display would cause less than substantial but unjustified harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building that cannot be outweighed by the limited and unsubstantiated public benefits claimed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy TP12 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266011902Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
- Dismissed19 August 202660089602 Leslie Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, B20 3NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006967123 Digbeth Road, Nechells, Birmingham, B12 0JU
- Allowed26 May 20266004581Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ
- Allowed26 May 20266004579Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®