Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 October 20233313667

Rear of 82 St. Johns Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 4DF

Planning appeal 3313667 at Rear of 82 St. Johns Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 4DF (Eastleigh Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 October 2023 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity and protected habitats, and the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a detached 4xbedroom bungalow, provided with associated access, car parking, amenity space and storage facilities

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
SO30 4DF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity and protected habitats, and the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants with specific regard to garden space and parking

What decided it

The failure of the proposed scheme to evidence a net gain in biodiversity in compliance with Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan, which could not be overcome by mitigation contributions alone.

The limited weight attributable to housing provision and economic/social benefits was outweighed by the adverse impacts on biodiversity, in accordance with paragraph 180 of the Framework which states housing provision should not come at the cost of harm to biodiversity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM11Policy DM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 180

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

54 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Eastleigh

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed28 October 20266015767
    4 Barfoot Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 2LL
  2. Dismissed9 June 20266008273
    Mayfield, Botley Road, Fair Oak, Southampton, SO50 7AD
  3. Dismissed30 December 20253369416
    Drummond Road, Shamblehurst, Hedge End, Hampshire, SO30 2AH
  4. Dismissed12 December 20253368160
    1 Gatcombe Gardens, West End , Hampshire, SO18 3NA
  5. Dismissed19 August 20253355330
    The Old Stables, 7 Winchester Street, Botley, Hampshire, SO30 2EB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.