Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 April 20233313877

99 Liddell Gardens, LONDON, NW10 3QB

the extension to ground floor and erection of 2nd storey side extension including rooflights, alteration to front door location

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Whalley J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed additions would be harmful to the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the side extensions on the amenities of the rear gardens of Nos. 126 and 128 College Road

What decided it

The proposed extension, with its setback first floor element and sufficient gap to the shared boundary, would not cause material harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling or unacceptable impact on neighbouring garden amenities.

Framework references: 006

Plan policies cited: SPD 2: Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.