Planning appeal decision
Beryl House, Spinel Close, Plumstead, London, SE18 1LL
described as, ‘The installation of 3No. support frames supporting 3No. antennas each (9No. antennas in total), the installation of 2No. 300mm dishes on frames, the installation of 3No. cabinets at rooftop level, and ancillary development thereto
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Teasdale N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Plumstead Common Conservation Area
What decided it
The considerable public benefits of enhanced digital communications infrastructure, including economic growth and improved connectivity, outweighed the less than substantial harm to the conservation area when balanced under NPPF paragraph 202.
Framework references: 114, 202
Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy HC1, Policy DH1, Policy DH3, Policy DH (h), Policy SI 6, Policy DH (c)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®